On the day before he was terrible killing, Charlie Kirk sent a message directly to X.
I was in the debate publicly on Ukrainian refugee killed And its relationship to race.
He said that the heinous killing of a white woman by a black man was only driven by the anti -egg hatred. I We condemned those comments On CNN as it has no basis. He went on TV and a minimum administrative. Then Annan fired fire waste from the tweets, challenging my argument.
Kirk’s reaction on the Internet sparked racist death threats against me, which I rarely saw.
Things were seriously heading from bars.
Then – in the middle of all this – Charlie Kerk continues.
Surprising Charlie Kerk message
He invited me to get his program to talk to him. books:
“Hey, Van, I mean, I would like to have a respected conversation about crime and race. I will be a noble man as I know you will be. We can disagree about compatible issues.”
A direct message from conservative activist Charlie Kirk to Van Jones, a day before Kirk was shot and killed in an event speaking. Van Jones
Unfortunately, before I was able to respond, Charlie Kirk was killed – Apparent assassination As for the words it causes, although the murderer’s accurate motives are still under investigation.
She has faced a problem with many of these words – sometimes strongly – but he has never talked about it. He was unprecedented in expressing these opinions and then returning home for his family. This is a sacred American value.
The condemnation of killing is not difficult
Therefore, it was not difficult to condemn his killing – immediately, without rehabilitation and an unconditional fragrance.
That afternoon I tweeted:
“Today’s attack on Charlie Kerk is very horrific and very terrified. He fought with words, not weapons. There is no place for political violence in our society and they should be brought quickly to justice. My prayer with Charlie loved ones, shock students at Utah Valley University and all who were affected by this great, impoverished act.”
Political killing is wrong, period. She was born in 1968 – in a country that is torn apart by riots and assassinations. I don’t want to return to that. None of us should.
In fact: Kirk’s killing gives us every reason to return to the dialogue table. There is an increasing wave of political violence that has already swept his life and many other life, from left and right.
Such violence should force people on both sides to reject heat, search for a common floor and search for slope from Vitriol-as Kirk was doing with me, the day before his death.
Charlie Kerk opposed censorship and “Civil War”
But instead, the opposite happens. People use his horrific assassination to call for more violence – justification of killing or even calling for a civil war! Government officials use his killing as an excuse for opposition control and silence.
Stand up! Wait a minute!
This is not the way Charlie Kerk is treated. never.
When our general conflict began to go sideways, what was Kirk’s response?
He paid for more conversation, not more silence or censorship.
It has been paid for more chicks, not more surfaces or poison.
Whatever you think about the legacy of Kirk, this simple fact is worthy of praise – something that everyone should support and seek to repeat.
If you are on the right, please do not surrender from open discussion and dialogue. Charlie did not. i won’t. I am the same call to people on the left.
Do not deceive violence
Whatever the aspect in which you are, do not let yourself give up the belief that political violence is the way. Let’s be real: most of the online people who are calling for killing and could not be able to win a fight with a house. They pretend that they are ready to storm the barricades.
Most of them are not.
And when it is worth it, you may think we hate each other on TV and online. But for the largest part, we do not do that. We are discussing hard. We try to win the elections. Along the way, we sometimes urinate each other.
But we do not want to harm each other. We do not want more bloodshed in our country. We do not want more funerals in America. Most critics and influencers do not try to raise a kind of civil war. We just do our functions and deny our calls, as much as we can. That’s it.
When things go out of control, someone usually calls someone. We try to speak. We seek reform. Because each of us only wants to be able to say our article and return home for our children. That’s it.
Please – everyone – think about following a similar approach in your place and space. Let’s go down from this frightening path that we are. Let’s solve – with the words of Charlie Kirk – “Do not agree on compatible issues.”
The correct way to fight
Despite all our differences, I did not want to see the other person ever to see the other person damaged or controlled.
On the contrary: I wanted to overcome Charlie Kerk intellectually-by overcoming it. I wanted to see the progressive, hitting him politically-by organizing it.
None of the task was easy. Charlie Kerk was one of the best organizers and organizers of our time. But this was the correct way for us to deal with our differences.
This was what was on the table when he sent me messages on Tuesday last week.
Unfortunately, he stole a cowardly shower of conservatives from emerging talent, progressive to a discount that is worth and a family of the loving father.
In the aftermath of this killing, Americans have the option to do.
We can choose to go to more violence, more anger and more control – if we want it.
But if we choose censorship and civil war, we cannot blame this choice for Charlie Kerk!
Since the last 24 hours, I have evidence that he wants to go in a very different way.
For more CNN news and newsletters, create an account on Cnn.com
Source link
