Home / General / Sean Penn Says Charlie Kirk Assassination Was ‘Different’ From Health Insurance CEO, Others: ‘We Need That Debate’

Sean Penn Says Charlie Kirk Assassination Was ‘Different’ From Health Insurance CEO, Others: ‘We Need That Debate’

Sean Penn Says Charlie Kirk Assassination Was ‘Different’ From Health Insurance CEO, Others: ‘We Need That Debate’
Spread the love

Sean Ben said in an interview with the New York Times, which was published on Saturday that the death of Charlie Kerk was “different” from the presence of the CEO of United Highracare Brian Thompson and Minnesota House House Emerita Melissa Hortman.

“I think we are Need This man. We need this discussion. “

More from Thewrap

Ben was asked about the death of Kirk because it happened just a few days before he sat with the Times. The actor carefully put a response that measures what it means to be a “human being on the ground” before he was dealt with directly.

“First of all, just like a human being on the face of the earth, it is fair to say that I am treating what happened. I have increasingly lost any kind of understanding about the reason we as a country compatible with the polarization facing the audience, when any of us who talks to each other understands that while there is this amazing partisan that is expressed in irritation of politics and the media, it is not the situation with individuals.”

“I will reach Charlie Kerk. These costumes are violence; this looks different. It looks different from members of Congress. It seems different from the insurance executive. It seems different from the president’s attempt. There is something about this.”

Although Ben also said he had not followed Kirk’s work, he said that he was suspected that the conservative podquaster was “one of these people who do not agree with them almost everything.”

See also  Senate Health Care Votes: Major Reforms Are Urgently Needed

“I didn’t feel the feeling that he was one of the sellers of snake oil. I think we are Need This man. He continued: “We need this discussion.” These things come to fashion, and the way we kill its fashion is people of conscience on both sides, they realize that if someone believes in something, then this is your friend

After Pennsylvania was asked whether his answer depends on what someone believes, he explained: “ I am not talking about some social Nazism. I am talking about if someone thinks that a person begins to become pregnant, if you cannot understand this concept, you are just stupid. And if you are not ready to tolerate the concept as a concept, it is deeply held, and I may have a belief that I do not know, Let the woman decide. All these opinions are valid. What is the consensus in society, Cavily? This killer who shot the executive official? I am not a fan of health insurance companies, but Jesus, man, is this the best argument I got? “

Read the interview with Sean Ben in the New York Times.

Pamphlet Sean Bin says that the assassination of Charlie Kirk was “different” from the CEO of Health Insurance, and the others: “We need this discussion.” First appear on Thewrap.



Source link

Tagged: