OpenAI’s viral Studio Ghibli moment highlights AI copyright concerns

Spread the love

It has been only one day since the new ChatgPT photo generator appeared, social media extracts are already immersed in the momentum created from artificial intelligence in GHibli studio style, and the preferred Japanese animated studio behind scent films such as “Garrati Totoro” and “SERIID AWAY”.

In the past 24 hours, we have seen pictures created from artificial intelligence representing the GHibli studio versions of Elon MuskLord of the ringsAnd, and President Donald Trump. It seems that the CEO of Openai Sam Altman Make the image of his new profile GHIBLI-STYLE studio imageIt is supposed to be made from the original GPT-4O photo generator. Users seem to upload the pictures and photos in Chatgpt and ask Chatbot to re -create them in new patterns.

The last update of Openai comes in the aftermath of the Google version of its similar AI’s image feature in its Gemini Flash, which also sparked a viral moment earlier in March when people used it to remove watermarks from the images.

It makes the latest Openai and Google tools easier than ever re-created copyright-based business patterns by writing a text router. Together, these new artificial intelligence image features revive fears at the heart of many lawsuits against the developers of artificial intelligence models. If these companies are training in copyrights protected, do the copyright law violate?

According to Ivan Brown, the lawyer for the intellectual property at the NEAL & MCDEVITT, products such as GPT-4O IMAGE Generator in a legal gray area today. The style does not seem to be explicitly protected by copyright, according to Brown, which means that Openai does not seem to break the law simply by creating pictures that appear to be the Studio Ghibli films.

However, Brown says it is reasonable that Openai has achieved this similar by training his model on millions of tires from GHibli films. Even if this is the case, many courts still decide whether to train artificial intelligence models on copyright -protected business falls under the protection of fair use.

“I think this raises the same question that we ask ourselves two years ago,” Brown said in an interview. “What are the effects of violating the copyright of the exit, crawling on the web, and copying these databases?”

The New York Times and many publishers are located in active lawsuits against Openai, claiming that the company trained artificial intelligence models on copyright -protected business without attribution or appropriate payment. There were similar claims filed in lawsuits against other leading artificial intelligence companies, including Meta and Ai-Heneration Startup Midjourney.

In a statement of Techcrunch, an Openai spokesman says that although Chatgpt refuses to repeat “the style of individual artists”, Openai allows it to repeat “wider studio patterns.” Of course, it should be noted that there are living artists who are credited with their unique studio patterns, such as the co -founder of Studio Gheibli, Hayao Miyazaki.

It is clear that users have also been able to use the GPT-4O feature to generate original images to re-create patterns from studios and other artists. Another person did Mark Andrink’s picture in a style Dr. SoussAnd re -creative couple Wedding pictures in Pixar style.

We have experienced many famous artificial intelligence generators – including those available in Google’s Gemini, Xai’s Grok and Playground.ai – to see its ability to match the GHibli studio style. We have found that the new Openai photo generator created the most accurate identical version of the animation studio style.

A real (left) dog and a picture created from artificial intelligence to chat a dog made in the style of GHibli (right) studio.Image credits:Maxwell Zef/Openai

Currently, the new Openai and Google features offer a leap forward while artificial intelligence models can create, which appears to lead to an increase in use. Openai delayed the launch of its new photo tool for free users on Wednesday, noting the high demand. This may be the most important thing for these companies today, but we have to wait until the courts inspect their legitimacy.

Source link