When Voltron announced her A $ 22 million financing round Earlier this week, AI was keen to highlight a major investor: Craft Ventures, the company “Participated in its establishment by AI White House David Sacks”.
This advertisement raised questions about the conflict of interest in the Trump administration, where both AI and Crypto CZAR work while maintaining its role in Craft Ventures – an arrangement that critics see a new model for government service as the lines between the general duty and special gains have become unclear.
Sacks did not get one except two ethics exemptions, which allows him to form a federal policy while maintaining financial risks in the same industries that he supervises. the Firstly11 -page document, covering its encryption investments. the secondIssued in June, specifically addresses his property of artificial intelligence. Together, they enabled what ethics experts call an unprecedented order.
“This is the illegal gain,” said Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University who specializes in government ethics, after reviewing the coding of Sachs. “This is it lawyer In the office of the White House Adviser offers Trump’s offer, and allowing [Sacks] Earn money while isolating criminal responsibility. “
Clark analysis is crucial. It indicates that the waiver discusses the percentage of the total bags of the bags – when it was signed, its share in the total letter portfolio is less than 3.8 % of its total assets, for example – but never reveals the actual dollar amounts. Clark said: “The fact that this interest is only 3.8 % of the total assets of a person, this is something if you are talking about a law professor. But 3.8 % of the assets of this man are a group of money.”
Clark also argues that the waiver fails to consider any consideration of potential upward treatment. Federal regulations require the examination of the current value, but “profit or possible loss”. Clark notes a project for a project like bags, “even if it is now [if his shares are] Less than 3.8 % of its assets, if good, may be more. ”
Craft Ventures did not respond to several requests from Techcrunch this week to discuss this story.
TECHRUNCH event
San Francisco
|
27-29 October, 2025
Voltron investment
The timing of the Voltron advertisement shows the complexity. Voltron creates artificial intelligence tools specifically for federal contractors, helping them to win government contracts more efficiently. The company is proud to reduce the timelines for the proposal “from weeks to days” and demands the Fortune 500 customer who now preserves “more than 20 hours per week every week” on federal contracting work.
A source close to the company says that the investment of the Craft Ventures precedes the government appointment of bags. However, the timing raises questions: AI CZAR in the country has a financial share in a company that helps them help companies win the same federal contracts that its policies will affect.
Senator Elizabeth Warren was among the most vocal critics of these arrangements. In a letter to the Government Ethics Office, a member of the Senate Banking Committee asked about the waiver of Sachs, noting that at the same time he “participated in hosting a $ 1.5 million dinner for players in the encryption industry” while forming a federal encryption policy.
Warren wrote: “Speedly leads Mr. Sachs invested a company that has invested in encryption while directing the country’s encryption policy,” Warren wrote. “Usually, this federal law will prohibit the conflict of explicit interests.”
SACKS greatly rejected Warren’s concerns, accusing her of the existence of “Pathogenic For the encryption community. “He said separately that he sold a wealth in encryption before joining the White House” because I didn’t even want to get appearance From the conflict. “
In fact, the sacrifices of the bags refer to the sacrifices he made to government service. According to his concessions, he and the craft projects have stripped more than $ 200 million in digital assets, with at least $ 85 million, attributed directly to him. He sold stakes in fast -growing companies, including his position in Elon Musk, and began selling interests in about 90 investment capital boxes, including Sequoia funds.
The source close to the bags confirms these disposal operations of these disposals, noting that because of its governmental role, craft projects must now manage each deal of artificial intelligence and encryption after the White House Ethics Committee. They suggest that this supervision makes it reasonable to invest in feeding funds and smaller deals, given the size of the work that may be required for all concerned.
Clark argues that the primary moral frame is still defective. She says the same exemptions are designed to provide a legal cover rather than address ethical concerns. She said, “This is whitening.” It is more complicated, Sacks as a government employee only 130 days per year – actually every week – while maintaining his commercial activities during periods. In September, for example, Sacks and his harassment participating in popular podcasts, all of them, will photograph what has become a three -day annual conference that the attendees pay $ 7,500 per person to join. While these activities are legally permitted, these activities increase their lines between their public and private roles.
Some observers wonder whether the billionaire billionaire is by Forbes-to announce and exit government service. With the genius law now, its basic mission may be seen: bringing the cryptocurrency from the margin to the lead center.
But this is likely to take some time. Logs used the look of Fox News yesterday to detail its urgent priorities after ACT, with a focus on developing organizational frameworks in three main areas, including identifying the market structure categories (securities against goods against digital assets), expanding Stablecoin regulations, and evaluating potential national digital assets.
Meanwhile, critics are interested in conflicting interests that a precedent has been identified. The rapid residence of friendly legislation for encryption, as well as continuous investments in artificial intelligence companies that serve the federal government, indicates that bags and others with similar arrangements have placed themselves and their wider orbit to benefit from the government’s arrival.
Whether this represents a new nature of the Silicon Valley relations with Washington, or instead, it still should be seen. What is clear is that the frameworks of traditional ethics may be insufficient for the era in which capitalists can maintain their investment activities with the formation of policies that determine the value of those investments at the same time.
Currently, the arrangement continues, protected by carefully made exemptions that ethics experts questioned but they find legally unavailable. As Clark says, “No one will be able to sue him.”
