Last Thursday, five organizations from across the ideological spectrum I sent a message Call on Congress to rein in the President’s deployment of the National Guard at home. One message follows another Court ruling Regarding the legality of publishing operations. Noting that Trump’s National Guard deployments are “alien to our nation’s laws, history, and values,” the letter asks Congress to reaffirm its constitutional responsibility to prevent the president from establishing a “personal standing army on American soil.” Groups signing the letter include Demand, Mormon Women for Ethical Government, the R Street Institute, the Rule of Law Institute Association, and the Rutherford Institute.
“Members of the armed forces, including the federal National Guard, did not volunteer to serve their countries only to be abused by politicians against their fellow Americans.” The message stated. “They deserve better. Given the urgency and seriousness of this matter, lawmakers must act now, on behalf of our military and our civilian communities. Congress must not wait idly for the federal courts to intervene.”
“The local deployment of the military carries significant risks to freedom, public safety and military readiness,” he said. Greg Nunziata, Executive Director of the Rule of Law Association Institute. “The use of the military for domestic law enforcement should be considered only in extreme and unusual circumstances, for a brief period and under strict supervision. The people’s representatives in Congress must assert their authority over these important matters, and not simply acquiesce to the whims of this or any future president.”
“MWEG members from across the country have felt profound discomfort as they watched the Army’s domestic deployments this year,” he said. Emma Adams, co-executive director of Mormon Women for Ethical Government. He added: “Their party affiliations and political ideologies may differ, but they are united in urging Congress to represent them and use its authority firmly and ethically on this matter.”
“Every time the president treats ordinary protests as insurrection and sends soldiers to impose so-called ‘order’ in our cities, he is not defending the nation — he is dismantling the freedoms it defines, while at the same time betraying the Constitution,” he said. John W. Whitehead, President of the Rutherford Institute.
“Using the military to address routine public safety issues fundamentally misunderstands the distinct roles that civilian law enforcement and the armed forces play in our society,” he said. Sarah Anderson is associate director of criminal justice and civil liberties at the R Street Institute. “Deploying troops to patrol American cities against the wishes of local officials risks undermining public trust, blurring basic legal boundaries, and distracting from proven methods that actually promote safety and strengthen communities. Congress must act to maintain the bright line between military and law enforcement and ensure that our response to crime protects liberty and relies on effective public safety strategies.”
“President Trump’s illegal deployment of the National Guard is a problem that transcends partisan politics,” he said. Application Policy Director Emily Peterson Cassin. “No president, whether Republican or Democrat, should treat our Armed Forces as a personal tool to be used against his or her political enemies. Congress must intervene on behalf of our Armed Forces and our Constitution.”
Source link
